Machiavelli

Republics vs. Principalities

10 min read

When Democracy Works The tension between republics and principalities runs through all of Machiavelli’s work. The Prince is a manual for autocrats, teaching princes how to acquire and maintain personal power through methods that often contradict republican values. The Discourses on Livy is a celebration of republican government, analyzing the Roman Republic’s success and drawing lessons for modern republics. This apparent contradiction has puzzled readers for centuries. Was Machiavelli a republican who wrote The Prince as satire or as a desperate job application? Was he a cynical realist who recognized that republics were noble failures while principalities were effective? Or...

Members Only
At Least Scholar Access Required
This article is available to Scholar and Master members. Join the Library to access the full archive.
← Back to Machiavelli